LDS Temple Changes, Sexism, and Racism

I was thinking about the LDS temple changes (see here), and the problem of alleged sexism in the ordinances. The issue should end at the statement that God is no respecter of persons, male or female (incidentally, the racism question should end with the statement that God is no respecter of persons black or white, and the class question should end when he says neither bond nor free, meaning employed worker or business owner). Yet, there are other things involved that seem to show a disparity between practice and teachings. So, looking at it first from the standpoint of not judging God, and taking the assumption that IF we have correct translations of scriptures, and the overriding characteristic of God is he is no respecter of persons, then there MUST be a non-sexist, non-racist, non-class biased view of seemingly problematic passages and ordinances.

Taking that line of reasoning, one could argue that feminist theory is reducing all patriarchal systems to simplistic terms in order to blanket accuse them of sexism. If we grant that most patriarchal systems tend to become sexist, but there is one possible version that is non-sexist, what would it look like? Would it look like a system of priesthood designed to create a servitude for men to eradicate the natural man tendencies? Why would women want to enslave themselves in that portion of the priesthood meant to enslave men’s baser nature?

Next, would not the allegorical elements in the Garden of Eden story need to be prefigured with the reality that God was outlining a fallen condition for man? If God states fallen conditions as a de-evolved relationship for man and woman (as in, before the fall, men and women were equal, but after, in a state of nature, the woman would desire the protection of the husband when she was burdened with the trauma of childbearing to reproduce the race), then there is no harm in the ordinances relating that symbolic fact of fallenness. Only, the LDS leaders jealously guarded the second anointing ceremonies as a power play to reward institutional loyalty, making the redemptive balance women had in the drama hidden. Only women can make kings and validate that a man has overcome the fallen nature. The first shall be last and the last first.

Without understanding this, the LDS have caved to accusations from ignorant and faulty feminist theory and have removed the drama that shows WHY sexism is prevalent, and HOW to overcome it. There is an interdependence between the sexes that feminist theory, in part, ignores and hates. Neither is the man without the woman and the woman without the man, in the Lord (individual exceptions due to uncontrollable circumstances aside).

Instead of 12 men deciding if you should receive the second anointing with a spouse, it is probably more accurate to say a council of 7 women, including the wife, decide when a man has risen from the fallen conditions, after learning from the man’s accurate revelations what the order of the priesthood means for their responsibilities to do so. Just some speculations. There is also the possibility that we have some things translated incorrectly in the Bible, and the Book of Mormon is more accurate in these regards. My speculations try to harmonize things first assuming we have enough corrections in the scripture translations to deal with this issue.

The race question in Mormonism goes generally as follows: Noah was a real man who really had three sons. Noah held a position as president of the entire human race. It was a position only passed from father to son, so yes, a Patriarchal reign. Only, it had strict conditions for passing it down to a worthy heir, one where righteousness preempted any qualifications gained from birth order and being the firstborn. One of Noah’s sons, Ham, mimicked the royal process and established some kind of order with his son Canaan that represented a flawed system with no safeguards against unrighteous rule. Although the first Pharaoh and others were righteous, the system was corrupt, and Noah rightly prophesied their corrupt system was a curse and would lead to their children becoming enslaved.

Noah never said it was good for their children to be enslaved, it was just the natural result of their behavior if they didn’t forsake their attempts at faulty kingdom making. The tribalism in Africa has led to such fractures and power imbalances that the worse scourge of slavery eventually caught up with them. Slavery was not a “just” or a “righteous” punishment. It was a scourge. God is merciful and always works to free men from slavery. We get caught up in circumstances where wicked and greedy people take advantage of our small errors. By small and simple things are great things (bad and good) brought to pass. That doesn’t make slavery right or a fair punishment, it is the nature of a fallen world that God continually seeks to save us from. If we take his advice with small course corrections, we can spare ourselves from huge, unfair, consequences that wicked people inflict on other portions of the human race. At the end of the probationary periods, God comes out in swift judgment against the wicked who enslave others and rewards all those who suffer unfairly. More speculative thoughts based on using explanations of God’s character and attributes to guide the interpretation of scripture.

Advertisements

Spiritual Experiences in the Netherlands and Ireland

I went to the Netherlands to present some of my scholarly findings on early Mormon enjoyment of popular culture in Nauvoo. In addition to the school conference in Middelburg, I had the thought to rededicate Europe and Ireland (I had a long layover in Dublin) for preaching the gospel as well as gathering in the good from any other sheep that have heard Christ’s voice over time and in the present.

I remembered Denver mentioning that when Moses took off his sandals, it was to make the ground holy and not necessarily the reverse. I found private spots and took my shoes and socks off and planted my feet down on soil in the Netherlands and Dublin and gave the prayers I received and wrote down prior to rededicating the lands. I wasn’t thinking I was holy enough to make the lands holy with my feet, but thought it was a fitting part of the ordinance in memorial of Moses’ and other’s acts. It also seemed an appropriate introductory bookend to get soil on my feet for a land opened to preaching if there is also a closing ordinance wiping the dust off of one’s feet when a land loses the blessing and the people are cut off from preaching (hopefully the latter is never necessary).

Here are the prayers:

11-18-18 Dedication of Europe at Middelburg, Netherlands:

It’s Sunday, November 18 at 3:50 P.M. in Middelburg, Netherlands, sitting in front of a statue called “de Ringrijder.” [the Ring Rider] in front of the main church which has a red royal crown at the top of a huge steeple by the third tree from the church that has concrete around it. I just put my bare feet on the soil here—planted down.

O Father, this is your servant Brian, answering your prompting to rededicate this land. There are other servants more worthy than I who would perform this work if given the chance, and perhaps someone already has. I recognize there is goodness in the peoples here to learn from. There are still many treasures of wisdom to appreciate and gather, while those of us who have consented to your covenant are still weak, unlearned, and sometimes less virtuous and less righteous than others. But you have said you would show forth your wisdom through the weak things of the earth in the Teachings and Commandments section 141 verse 1. Therefore, on this spot in Middelburg, Netherlands at the tree I described on November 18 at 3:53 P.M. in 2018, having authority given me of Jesus Christ, I dedicate and rededicate this land and continent of Europe for the preaching of the gospel of Christ and for learning from any other sheep who already hear his voice on this land, that all things may be gathered in one in Christ, in the name of Jesus Christ, Amen.

I said this prayer while kneeling on my right knee.

11-20-18 Dedication of Ireland at Santry Demense on the path towards the Walled Garden, Dublin, Ireland:

[I put my bare feet on the soil here as well, next to the first bench in the park from the entrance across from the Holiday Inn Express where I stayed.]

I’m here in Dublin, Ireland at Santry Demense, a park near the Walled Garden.

O Father, this is your servant Brian, answering your prompting to rededicate this land in Ireland where my prominent ancestral homeland [is] that gave rise to my grandmother’s line who introduced us to the restored gospel of Jesus Christ revealed through your servant, Joseph Smith, Jr. I recognize there is goodness in these peoples as well to learn from and still many treasures of wisdom to appreciate and gather. Therefore, on this spot in Dublin, Ireland at 7:51 A.M. on Wednesday, November 20, 2018, having authority given me of Jesus Christ, I dedicate and rededicate this land of Ireland for the preaching of the gospel of Christ and for learning from any other sheep who already hear his voice on this land, that all things may be gathered in one in Christ, in the name of Jesus Christ, Amen.

[I said this prayer while kneeling on my right knee as well.]